North Coast Portal

Other Articles in This Issue
Mattole Restoration Council
After twenty years or more of intensive bioregional efforts, the watershed concept seems to have grown strong roots here...

The Gienger Report...Diggin In
The last "Diggin' In" column covered numerous topics, including the Board of Forestry's (BoF) formation of a Forest St...

Conservation Easements: An International Movement
Conservation Easements: An International Movement by Herb Schwartz This column has focused primarily on mechanics:...

Alliance For Sustainable Jobs and the Environment
ASJE's high-priority Working Group projects are sweeping us full speed into 2001. Please join us for the ASJE Member...

Bari vs. USA: Putting the FBI on Trial
Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney's federal civil rights lawsuit against the FBI and the Oakland Police Department is coming ...

Pepper Spray Plaintiffs Prevail Again
After the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the plaintiff pepper spray victims, reinstating their lawsuit against law enfo...

The Collapse of the Climate Treaty Negotiations and Forests
The collapse of the Climate Treaty negotiations and forests Last November, more than 170 countries met in the Hague,...

Rainbow Ridge
In this issue, we take a close look at Rainbow Ridge and some of our Affiliate and fiscally sponsored groups that are wo...

Contact Us

Trees Foundation
PO BOX 2202
Redway, CA 95560

New office location!
439 Melville
Garberville, CA 95542

Phone: (707) 923-4377
Fax: (707) 923-4427
trees@treesfoundation.org

 


Home
/ Publications / Forest & River News / Winter 2001 /

Pepper Spray Plaintiffs Prevail Again

January 30, 2001


After the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the plaintiff pepper spray victims, reinstating their lawsuit against law enforcement officers who had assaulted them with pepper spray, the defendant agencies filed a petition for further review with the Ninth Circuit. The petition for rehearing, directed to judges Pregerson, Fletcher, and Bright (the panel that had overruled District Court Judge Vaughn Walker and reopened the suit), asked the court to reconsider the original decision in favor of the plaintiffs.

The panel denied the request for rehearing and reissued the opinion. The defendants also petitioned for en banc review, a rehearing before the full Ninth Circuit of the failed appeal. Such requests are directed to each of the more than twenty judges who sit on the Ninth Circuit. Not one judge requested en banc review of the decision, and the request therefore was denied.

So what happens next? Attorney Brendan Cummings anticipates a status conference within the next thirty days in front of Judge Walker, who will once again preside over the case. Cummings expects that a new trial date will be set at that point.



Printer Friendly Version


More Articles...

TOC for Forest & River News, Winter 2001







Home
/ Publications / Forest & River News / Winter 2001 /

Contact Us Links Make a Donation