Site Search
Recommended Links

North Coast Portal
Information on regional lands, environmental issues, travel and more.

Contact Us

Trees Foundation
PO BOX 2202
Redway, CA 95560

Other Articles in This Issue
Editior's Note
The early part of this decade witnessed the strongest housing market and the highest demand for softwood building produc...

Community-based Forestry: Legitimacy and Stability for PL Lands
In January of 2007, Pacific Lumber Company (PL), through its two components, Scotia Pacific and Palco, filed for Chapter...

Community-based Forestry: Community Restoration Begets an Approach to Community Forestry
When the Mattole Restoration Council was founded in 1983, it grew out of the founders' realization that salmon don't jus...

Community-based Forestry: Why Community Forestry? And Why Now?
"Community-based forestry (CBF) is a participatory approach to forest management that strengthens communities' capaci...

Wildfire Effects: Fire and Hydrophobic Soils
As I tap away at my computer keys, the sun outside once again filters through the trees. Weather forecasts predict rain ...

Diggin' In: The Gienger Report
I've been wondering how to approach the topic of "Community Forests," or "Community Forestry," and/or "Community-based F...

North Coast Living: A 22-year Long Creek Restoration Concluded
Bill Eastwood and Harry Vaughn are men who take the long view. This past week, they put the finishing touches on an envi...

Spreading Awareness about Conservation of Indigenous Lands
Two documentaries which feature the cultural land conservation work of InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council have invo...

Cereus Fund 2008
With sincere gratitude and deep appreciation for your continued support... Established by a private donor a...

Introducing the Rogue Riverkeeper
For ten years, the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center (KS Wild)has been a leader in public lands and wildlife advocacy. P...

Good Roads, Clear Creeks Program Update
The Mattole Restoration Council's Good Roads, Clear Creeks (GRCC) Program completed another successful work season this ...

Baby Salmon Rescued from Certain Death
Tributary creeks dried up faster than anyone can remember this year due to the driest spring since rainfall records bega...

27th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference: Elements of Watershed Restoration
The 27th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference will be held March 4-7, 2009, in Santa Cruz, California. This year the c...

Contact Us

Trees Foundation
PO BOX 2202
Redway, CA 95560

New office location!
439 Melville
Garberville, CA 95542

Phone: (707) 923-4377
Fax: (707) 923-4427
trees@treesfoundation.org

 


Home
/ Publications / Forest & River News / Winter 2008 /

Wildfire Effects
Fire and Hydrophobic Soils

by Jodi Ferdiani of Central Coast Forest Watch
December 31, 2008


As I tap away at my computer keys, the sun outside once again filters through the trees. Weather forecasts predict rain this coming weekend, but to date (nearly the end of October) we have had at most one inch of precipitation in the Santa Cruz Mountains. That first rain event led to Reverse 911 calls to downstream residents of the 4,000 acre Summit Fire, warning of potential flooding, debris flows and torrents, and hazardous road conditions. Of course, once the rains begin in earnest and the bare hillsides mobilize, hazards to our threatened steelhead and endangered coho salmon populations will be imminent as well.

But just what will those adverse impacts to fish be, and will they be long-term as well as short-term? Fish have evolved with fire, but at a time when human-scale land use activities were at a minimum. And fire regimes have altered with decades of fire suppression, logging, and grazing, which have removed fire-adapted species or specimens. Science is attempting to understand the extent of modern fire impacts to fish and forest health as well as its effects on global warming. I will attempt to keep the interests of fish as well as forest and watershed health in focus as I write this and future columns on fire for this newsletter.

Summit Fire--the overstory canopy in redwood lined riparian corridor remains largely intact.
Photo: Jodi Frediani
    
Within the Summit Fire perimeter, large areas of chaparral and Knobcone pine, some hardwoods, and grassland burned hot and rapidly, spurred onwards by swift winds. Douglas-fir and redwoods on the perimeter of chaparral areas suffered heat damage. Individual conifers as well as trees alongside open areas seemed to suffer most. While hardwood leaves and conifer needles turned brown from intense heat, very little crowning was observed, as shown by an absence of charred treetops throughout the landscape. Once it entered the dense second-growth redwood forest and the heavily forested riparian canyons, the fire went `to ground,' burning as a lower intensity understory fire. While overstory canopy remains largely intact in most of these areas, deep, loose layers of ash and minimal understory vegetation and duff will contribute to additional soil loss once the rains commence. Our local Natural Resource Conservation Service field representative is predicting that several million cubic yards of sediment will mobilize this winter.

Hydrophobicity will be a factor in overall erosion and sediment input into Soquel and Corralitos Creeks. You may scratch your head remembering that hydrophobia or `fear of water' is a symptom of rabies. Well, fires can cause the formation of soils that repel water, known as hydrophobic soils. According to the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, (www.statlab.iastate.edu/survey/SQI/) "A thin layer of soil at or below the mineral soil surface can become hydrophobic after intense heating. The hydrophobic layer is the result of a waxy substance that is derived from plant material burned during a hot fire. The waxy substance penetrates into the soil as a gas and solidifies after it cools, forming a waxy coating around soil particles."

The significance of such a layer is that it repels water, reducing the amount of infiltration from rainfall and runoff. With increased surface flows comes increased erosion and sediment input into streams. Sometimes this hydrophobic layer can persist for years, especially if it is relatively thick. Much of the fertile topsoil layer may be `lost', but this loss may actually bring added fertility to stream systems. However, while surface flows are increased, the reduced water infiltration lessens the likelihood of debris slides on denuded steep slopes. Disturbing this layer could actually increase sediment loads in streams. Over time, as plants regenerate and growth resumes, plant roots, soil microorganisms, and soil fauna will break down the hydrophobic layer.

Understory and ground fuels burned as fire went "to ground" in a selectively logged redwood forest. Thick layer of ash may mobilize and enter streams.
Photo: Jodi Frediani
Not all wildfires create a water-repellent layer. The four factors that lead to hydrophobic soils are a thick layer of plant litter prior to the fire, high-intensity surface and/or crown fires, prolonged periods of intense heat and coarse textured soils. Hydrophobic layers have been identified within the Summit Fire burn area. These layers are usually one-half to three inches beneath the soil surface and commonly up to one inch thick, but sometimes up to three inches thick.

To check for a hydrophobic layer, scrape away the ash layer and expose the mineral soil surface. Place a drop of water on the air-dry soil and wait one minute. If the water beads, then the soil layer is hydrophobic. Because the upper few inches of soil are often not hydrophobic, it may be necessary to scrape away another one-half to one inch of soil and test again for the upper level of water-repellency. If you continue to scrape away the soil layers and repeat the water drop test, you can discern the depth of the hydrophobic layer.

Location of Summit Fire, including timber harvest plans, state parks & protected lands
Photo: Screenshot prepared by Jodi Frediani in Google Earth
While disturbing the layer may seem intuitive, experts recommend leaving the layer intact. Fallen logs may be placed across slopes to slow runoff and intercept sediment. On gentle and steep slopes, straw mulch (sterile, so as not to introduce invasive species) may be scattered to protect the soil from erosion. Check dams because silt fences may also be in order. Covering large areas with such measures may be impractical, but according to some scientists, there may be long-term benefits to fish from the addition of fertile topsoil, ash, and large wood into stream systems, even though short-term sediment loads may adversely affect spawning and feeding habitat.

While everyone is certain that significant rainfall will lead to substantially increased sediment loads in local streams, the impacts on salmonid fish populations are not so clear. In the short term, spawning habitat is likely to be inundated with heavy sediment layers, while large wood input will most likely increase. Given the very fragile existence of our few remaining endangered coho, buried spawning habitat could spell doom to fish in those watersheds. Just this summer, juvenile coho were found in Soquel Creek, where they had been conspicuously absent in recent years. Will they survive, will they return? And what about the more hardy steelhead trout? Only time will tell. For now, everyone is waiting to see how these denuded mountain slopes will fare this winter, if and when the rains do come.

For more info: jodifredi@aol.com



Printer Friendly Version
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation to this Organization

More Information About
Central Coast Forest Watch



More Articles...
TOC for Forest & River News, Winter 2008







Home
/ Publications / Forest & River News / Winter 2008 /

Contact Us Links Make a Donation
Support our efforts: for the trees!   ♥