Other Articles in This Issue
Watershed Restoration in the Temperate Rainforest of the North Coast
Despite all of our wealth and knowledge, we cannot create a redwood forest, a wild river, or a gleaming seashore.--Ly...

Watershed Restoration: Thirty Years of Progress
When I was asked a few weeks ago to "write up" some watershed restoration projects--how they worked, how they didn't wor...

Eel River Salmon Restoration Project
Springtime is soon upon us with new steelhead hatching and tree buds bursting. The Eel River Salmon Restoration Project ...

Restoration Lessons from Ancestor Creek
Watershed and fisheries restoration is part science, part art, part engineering, and part sociology. Ancestor Creek is j...

Future Forests and the Concept of "Ecosystem Services": Institute for Sustainable Forestry on the Cutting Edge
At the Institute for Sustainable Forestry's Future Forests working session last fall, a broad cross-section of Humboldt ...

Cereus Fund Highlights Eight Years of Sustaining Grassroots Environmental Projects
2006 Cereus Fund Grant Awards Bay Area Coalition for Headwaters (BACH) $5,000 This volunteer-dr...

THE Gienger REPORT...Diggin' In
Responding to the Winter Rains The record-setting rains of December were beneficial to salmon and steelhead mi...

Campaign to Restore Jackson State
The public comment period on the long-delayed revised Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Jackson State Forest ended o...

Conservation Congress
In June 2005, the Conservation Congress filed a lawsuit against the Shasta-Trinity National Forest over three timber sal...

The Environmental Protection Information Center
The Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC), Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center (KS Wild), and Center for Biol...

Humboldt Baykeeper
A bad policy by the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation, and Conservation District and the City of Eureka to dump 200,000 cu...

Institute for Sustainable Forestry
Nick's Interns After last year's highly successful New Forestry Trial Project at the Southern Humboldt Communi...

Klamath-Siskyou Wildlands Center
Some of the Most Valuable Wildlife Habitat in the Lower 48 The Klamath National Forest in the far northern rea...

Salmonid Restoration Federation
First Annual Spring-Run Chinook Confab--Butte Creek, July 27-29, 2006 The Salmonid Restoration Federation, in ...

Salmon Protection And Watershed Network
New Property Acquisition The Marin County-based Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN) recently acqui...

Marin County Once Again Welcomes the Coho Confab, August 25-27, 2006
Trees Foundation, the Salmonid Restoration Federation (SRF), and Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN) are pro...

Donor-Advised Program Achieves Your Conservation Goals
The Donor Advised Program links the conservation goals of individuals with the funding needs of North Coast community-ba...

Contact Us

Trees Foundation
PO BOX 2202
Redway, CA 95560

New office location!
439 Melville
Garberville, CA 95542

Phone: (707) 923-4377
Fax: (707) 923-4427
trees@treesfoundation.org

 


Home
/ Publications / Forest & River News / Spring 2006 /

Campaign to Restore Jackson State

April 5, 2006


The public comment period on the long-delayed revised Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Jackson State Forest ended on March 1, 2006, with public comments topping 6,000.

The EIR was subject to voluminous comment from experts coordinated by the Campaign to Restore Jackson State Forest, the Sierra Club, and other environmental groups detailing deficiencies of the plan. State agencies also submitted comments. The public response documents the numerous failures of the EIR to adequately describe and compare the environmental impacts of the proposed state logging plan and alternatives. See expert and agency comments at: www.jacksonforest.org.

In his comment, Vince Taylor showed conclusively that the inventory estimates used in the management plan and EIR are so greatly in error that the management plan and environmental report are invalid. Five influential members of the state Senate wrote to urge the Board of Forestry to reject the proposed management plan with its large-scale clearcutting.

Emails supporting management reform of Jackson State Forest topped 6,000. The public strongly expressed its desire to see Jackson Forest managed for ecological, recreational, and research values, not simply for timber production.

The outreach to obtain broad public comment was a joint effort of the Campaign to Restore Jackson State Forest, California Defenders of
Wildlife, the Sierra Club, Forests Forever, and numerous smaller groups and individuals.

The next step will be for the staff of the Board of Forestry to review and respond to all of the comments received. It may revise the document in light of the comments. This will likely take at least several months, given the large volume of detailed comments sent in by public experts and government agencies. The Board will then consider which of the alternatives in the plan to adopt.

If and when the environmental report is approved by the Board of Forestry, the Campaign will consider whether the legal deficiencies warrant filing a lawsuit.

Until a new environmental impact report and management plan are approved, the court-ordered halt to logging will continue.

For more information go to www.jacksonforest.org



Printer Friendly Version


More Articles...
TOC for Forest & River News, Spring 2006







Home
/ Publications / Forest & River News / Spring 2006 /

Contact Us Links Make a Donation